If you read yesterdays post you are up to speed on wavefront technology. OK, so far so good. It seems wavefront correction improves quality of vision after laser eye surgery. And indeed clinical trials confirm that vision results are much better after laser makers added the ‘wavefront‘ upgrades to their machines.
For example, the American made VISX lasers, used at all Optical Express laser clinics, have much better results when using their wavefront upgrade from 2002. I would not recommend having laser eye treatment today in 2008 without choosing the wavefront package on that system.

Wavefront laser eye surgery - is it the whole truth?
So now you want ‘wavefront‘ in your laser eye treatment! Of course, as the results are better. But when laser manufacturers introduced ‘wavefront’ they actually bundled in other improvements which may account for much of the jump in results! They just didn’t tell you. Why? Because it is complicated to describe all these improvements to someone who isn’t familiar with the technology – such as you, the patient!!
And honestly, I bet the sales people at most clinics talking on the phones who want to sell you a consultation don’t really understand it either! However, they have been trained to explain the wavefront part only, as something like this… “we take a scan, a unique fingerprint, of your vision and the use that fingerprint to perfectly correct your vision“. Go on, call them and check it out!
But for you, as a patient or customer, don’t really care about which part of that technology is helping you the most, you just want great vision, right?
So don’t let clinics blind you with science about wavefront scanners, wavefront maps, measuring hundreds of points of light or how much better their scanner is than other clinics scanners. It is usually marketing spin! Take it all with a pinch of salt.
However, you should choose the ‘wavefront option’ because within that package are the big improvements in laser eye treatment over the past several years. The success of surgery may actually be less to do with the true wavefront technology that has helped astronomy, but rather other improvements that may be confusing to patients but get wrapped up in the marketing of wavefront LASIK.
We come back to ethics again here. Is it ethical for some clinics to still sell ‘non-wavefront’ laser eye surgery technology that was replaced back in 2002?
For my own clinic, we do not offer non-wavefront treatments at all. None at all. I want every one of my patients to have the benefit of the newer laser eye surgery results. So we made it very affordable. In fact, we charge less for wavefront LASIK than other clinics do for their ‘entry level’ lower price non-wavefront LASIK. Really.
That’s my plug for FOCUS done! So, do choose wavefront but don’t pay more than you have to!