<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: When is a Cornea Too Thin for LASIK?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/</link>
	<description>Your personal on-call laser eye surgeon</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2012 13:00:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petrina</title>
		<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/comment-page-1/#comment-3607</link>
		<dc:creator>Petrina</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Mar 2012 16:59:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lasik-truth.com/?p=490#comment-3607</guid>
		<description>Many thanks for your response. If my prescription was lower say -4 they would perform lasek. they&#039;ve said that I would suffer from halos (perhaps the large pupils?) and would need to take MMC which they described as a powerful drug to combat this. Focus vision also said they wouldn&#039;t treat me for lasek but said to try ultralase. ultralase have said the other option is the ALI implant. I&#039;m not sure what that&#039;s about. I was all set to go ahead with my surgery next week but I&#039;m going to cancel it. I am disappointed as I&#039;m finding lenses less tolerable and my optician says they&#039;re running out of options. Anyway better to be safe. Thanks again. This is an excellent site.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many thanks for your response. If my prescription was lower say -4 they would perform lasek. they&#8217;ve said that I would suffer from halos (perhaps the large pupils?) and would need to take MMC which they described as a powerful drug to combat this. Focus vision also said they wouldn&#8217;t treat me for lasek but said to try ultralase. ultralase have said the other option is the ALI implant. I&#8217;m not sure what that&#8217;s about. I was all set to go ahead with my surgery next week but I&#8217;m going to cancel it. I am disappointed as I&#8217;m finding lenses less tolerable and my optician says they&#8217;re running out of options. Anyway better to be safe. Thanks again. This is an excellent site.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Allamby</title>
		<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/comment-page-1/#comment-3602</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Allamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2012 13:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lasik-truth.com/?p=490#comment-3602</guid>
		<description>Hi Petrina, At 460 corneal thickness I would certainly not recommend LASIK. We can also cut thin femto flaps, as can most clinics, but we only perform PRK/LASEK for thinner corneas. For LASIK, most specialists would want to leave a residual thickness of 300 microns or more after the flap has been made and following the (thinning) laser correction, as they believe this is safer. We also have a limit of 300 for safety. With your numbers for LASIK, even with a thin flap, you do not have enough tissue for a full correction without going thinner than 300 microns. So for me that is two strikes against performing LASIK. 
Also, what was the reason for not being suitable for PRK/LASEK?
thanks, David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Petrina, At 460 corneal thickness I would certainly not recommend LASIK. We can also cut thin femto flaps, as can most clinics, but we only perform PRK/LASEK for thinner corneas. For LASIK, most specialists would want to leave a residual thickness of 300 microns or more after the flap has been made and following the (thinning) laser correction, as they believe this is safer. We also have a limit of 300 for safety. With your numbers for LASIK, even with a thin flap, you do not have enough tissue for a full correction without going thinner than 300 microns. So for me that is two strikes against performing LASIK.<br />
Also, what was the reason for not being suitable for PRK/LASEK?<br />
thanks, David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petrina Durant</title>
		<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/comment-page-1/#comment-3597</link>
		<dc:creator>Petrina Durant</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 15:15:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lasik-truth.com/?p=490#comment-3597</guid>
		<description>Dear David

I went for an appointment with focus vision about three years ago and was refused treatment because my corneas were considered too thin. The optometrist recommended I try ultralase but advised against lasik. I recently went to ultralase and they are happy to perform the surgery they&#039;ve said that new technology means they can cut a very thin flap. My prescription is -5.25 and my corneas are about 460 microns. My prescription is not suitable for lasek. The alternative is ALI implants.  I haven&#039;t spoken to my surgeon yet but I am in constant contact with the optometrist who has emphasised that they wouldn&#039;t peform the surgery if it was unsafe. I&#039;d welcome your thoughts. I have large pupils - not sure if that&#039;s relevant and I&#039;m going for the &#039;lasik ultra elite&#039; option with monovision.
Petrina</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dear David</p>
<p>I went for an appointment with focus vision about three years ago and was refused treatment because my corneas were considered too thin. The optometrist recommended I try ultralase but advised against lasik. I recently went to ultralase and they are happy to perform the surgery they&#8217;ve said that new technology means they can cut a very thin flap. My prescription is -5.25 and my corneas are about 460 microns. My prescription is not suitable for lasek. The alternative is ALI implants.  I haven&#8217;t spoken to my surgeon yet but I am in constant contact with the optometrist who has emphasised that they wouldn&#8217;t peform the surgery if it was unsafe. I&#8217;d welcome your thoughts. I have large pupils &#8211; not sure if that&#8217;s relevant and I&#8217;m going for the &#8216;lasik ultra elite&#8217; option with monovision.<br />
Petrina</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave Allamby</title>
		<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/comment-page-1/#comment-3356</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave Allamby</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 09:18:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lasik-truth.com/?p=490#comment-3356</guid>
		<description>hi Prabhjot. I dont do LASIK for 480 corneas, but perform PRK instead, with or without mitomycin C depending on prescription. Regards, Dave</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi Prabhjot. I dont do LASIK for 480 corneas, but perform PRK instead, with or without mitomycin C depending on prescription. Regards, Dave</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: prabhjot dhody</title>
		<link>http://lasik-truth.com/lasik-laser-eye-surgery/when-is-a-cornea-too-thin-for-lasik/comment-page-1/#comment-3352</link>
		<dc:creator>prabhjot dhody</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jan 2012 04:35:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://lasik-truth.com/?p=490#comment-3352</guid>
		<description>hi....i have cornea thickness of 480...and have been advised for bladless lasik surgery ....please advise is it safe or is my cornea too thin</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hi&#8230;.i have cornea thickness of 480&#8230;and have been advised for bladless lasik surgery &#8230;.please advise is it safe or is my cornea too thin</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

